На сервере ЮИ СФУ размещены научные статьи

Аспирант Е. Тихонравов любезно предоставил  ЮИ СФУ научные статьи по следующей тематике: континентальное право (17 статей), общее право (69 статей), сравнительный анализ общего и континентального права (16 статей). Представленные работы опубликованы на английском языке в ведущих юридических журналах мира (Harvard Law Review, Columbia Law Review, The American Journal of Comparative Law, The American Journal of Legal History и др.). Список статей представлен ниже.

Скачать труды можно из внутренней сети по адресу (Сетевая Папка: Базы данных, Научные труды и методические материалы, ОСP)

CIVIL LAW

1. Dainow J. Civil Law Translations and Treatises Sponsored in Louisiana // The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 23, No. 3 (Summer, 1975), pp. 521-529.
2. Developments in the Law: Civil Commitment of the Mentally III // Harvard Law Review, Vol. 87, No. 6 (Apr., 1974), pp. 1190-1406.
3. Developments in the Law: The Paths of Civil Litigation // Harvard Law Review, Vol. 113, No. 7 (May, 2000), pp. 1752-1875.
4. English and Continental Systems of Law // The Modern Law Review, Vol. 43, No. 1 (Jan., 1980), p. 120.
5. G. S. On the Study of the Civil Law // The American Law Register (1852-1891), Vol. 11, No. 7, New Series Volume 2 (May, 1863), pp. 385-393.
6. Goudy H. A Digest of English Civil Law // Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law, New Series, Vol. 18, No. 1 (1918), pp. 133-135.
7. Grünhut M. English Law and the History of Continental Legislation // Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law, Third Series, Vol. 20, No. 4 (1938), pp. 165-182.
8. Helmholz R.H. Continental Law and Common Law: Historical Strangers or Companions? // Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1990, No. 6 (Dec., 1990), pp. 1207-1228.
9. Howe W.W. Roman and Civil Law in America // Harvard Law Review, Vol. 16, No. 5 (Mar., 1903), pp. 342-358.
10. Jenks E. English Civil Law. I // Harvard Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 1 (Nov., 1916), pp. 1-19.
11. Jenks E. English Civil Law. II // Harvard Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 2 (Dec., 1916), pp. 109-123.
12. Lipstein D.K. The Doctrine of Precedent in Continental Law with Special Reference to French and German Law // Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law, Third Series, Vol. 28, No. 3/4 (1946), pp. 34-44.
13. Matta L.F. Civil Law and Common Law in the Legal Method of Puerto Rico // The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 40, No. 4 (Autumn, 1992), pp. 783-815.
14. Merryman J. Civil Law Tradition // The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 35, No. 2 (Spring, 1987), pp. 438-441.
15. Quigley J. Socialist Law and the Civil Law Tradition // The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 37, No. 4 (Autumn, 1989), pp. 781-808.
16. Smith H.A. Interpretation in English and Continental Law // Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law, Third Series, Vol. 9, No. 4 (1927), pp. 153-164.
17. Tullis R.L. The Louisiana Civil Law, in the Light of Its Origin and Development // The University of Toronto Law Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2 (1938), pp. 298-318.

COMMON LAW

1. A.L.C. The Dead Hand of the Common Law // The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 27, No. 5 (Mar., 1918), pp. 668-673.
2. Adams G.B. The Origin of the Common Law // The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 34, No. 2 (Dec., 1924), pp. 115-128.
3. Adams G.B. The Origin of the English Courts of Common Law // The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 30, No. 8 (Jun., 1921), pp. 798-813.
4. Bingham J.W. Professor Kales and Common Law Remainders // Michigan Law Review, Vol. 5, No. 7 (May, 1907), pp. 497-508.
5. Bingham J.W. Some Suggestions concerning "Legal Cause" at Common Law // Columbia Law Review, Vol. 9, No. 1 (Jan., 1909), pp. 16-37.
6. Bingham J.W. Some Suggestions concerning "Legal Cause" at Common Law. II // Columbia Law Review, Vol. 9, No. 2 (Feb., 1909), pp. 136-154.
7. Bronaugh R. A Secret Paradox of the Common Law // Law and Philosophy, Vol. 2, No. 2 (Aug., 1983), pp. 193-232.
8. Carpenter C.E. Court Decisions and the Common Law // Columbia Law Review, Vol. 17, No. 7 (Nov., 1917), pp. 593-607.
9. Clark C.E., Trubek D.M. The Creative Role of the Judge: Restraint and Freedom in the Common Law Tradition // The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 71, No. 2 (Dec., 1961), pp. 255-276.
10. Common Law // The American Law Register (1852-1891), Vol. 7, No. 11 (Sep., 1859), pp. 703-704.
11. Criscuoli G. Is the Common Law Masculine or Feminine? // Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 1, No. 2 (Summer, 1981), pp. 305-306.
12. Dale R.C. The Adoption of the Common Law by the American Colonies // The American Law Register (1852-1891), Vol. 30, No. 9, New Series Volume 21 (Sep., 1882), pp. 553-574.
13. Dewees D.N. The Efficiency of the Common Law: Sulphur Dioxide Emissions in Sudbury // The University of Toronto Law Journal, Vol. 42, No. 1 (Winter, 1992), pp. 1-21.
14. Epstein R.A. The Social Consequences of Common Law Rules // Harvard Law Review, Vol. 95, No. 8 (Jun., 1982), pp. 1717-1751.
15. Epstein R.A. The Static Conception of the Common Law // The Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 9, No. 2, Change in the Common Law: Legal and Economic Perspectives (Mar., 1980), pp. 253-275.
16. Ewart J.S. What Is the Common Law? // Columbia Law Review, Vol. 4, No. 2 (Feb., 1904), pp. 116-126.
17. Field M.A. Sources of Law: The Scope of Federal Common Law // Harvard Law Review, Vol. 99, No. 5 (Mar., 1986), pp. 881-984.
18. Fowler R.L. The Future of the Common Law // Columbia Law Review, Vol. 13, No. 7 (Nov., 1913), pp. 595-611.
19. Garrett G.P. Our Common Law // Virginia Law Review, Vol. 10, No. 3 (Jan., 1924), pp. 207-213.
20. Gordley J. The Common Law in the Twentieth Century: Some Unfinished Business // California Law Review, Vol. 88, No. 6, Symposium of the Law in the Twentieth Century (Dec., 2000), pp. 1815+1817-1875.
21. Hahlo H.R., Gower L.C.B. Here Lies the Common Law: Rest in Peace // The Modern Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 3 (May, 1967), pp. 241-262.
22. Haskins G.L. A Problem in the Reception of the Common Law in the Colonial Period // University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 6 (May, 1949), pp. 842-853.
23. Haskins G.L. The Development of Common Law Dower // Harvard Law Review, Vol. 62, No. 1 (Nov., 1948), pp. 42-55.
24. Helmholz R.H. Continental Law and Common Law: Historical Strangers or Companions? // Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1990, No. 6 (Dec., 1990), pp. 1207-1228.
25. Hohmann H. The Nature of the Common Law and the Comparative Study of Legal Reasoning // The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 38, No. 1 (Winter, 1990), pp. 143-170.
26. Knafla L.A. Conscience in the English Common Law Tradition // The University of Toronto Law Journal, Vol. 26, No. 1 (Winter, 1976), pp. 1-16.
27. L. N. H. Common Law: Adoption by States // California Law Review, Vol. 8, No. 5 (Jul., 1920), pp. 340-342.
28. Lewis W.D. The Study of the Common Law // The American Law Register (1898-1907), Vol. 46, No. 8, Volume 37 New Series (Aug., 1898), pp. 465-483.
29. Michelman F. The Common Law Baseline and Restitution for the Lost Commons: A Reply to Professor Epstein // The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 64, No. 1 (Winter, 1997), pp. 57-69.
30. Murphy W.T. The Oldest Social Science? The Epistemic Properties of the Common Law Tradition // The Modern Law Review, Vol. 54, No. 2 (Mar., 1991), pp. 182-215.
31. Nijboer J.F. Common Law Tradition in Evidence Scholarship Observed from a Continental Perspective // The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 41, No. 2 (Spring, 1993), pp. 299-338.
32. Origin of the Common Law of England // The Virginia Law Register, Vol. 2, No. 1 (May, 1896), p. 67.
33. O'Sullivan R. A Scale of Values in the Common Law // The Modern Law Review, Vol. 1, No. 1 (Jun., 1937), pp. 27-38.
34. O'Sullivan R. Natural Law and Common Law // Transactions of the Grotius Society, Vol. 31, Problems of Public and Private International Law, Transactions for the Year 1945 (1945), pp. 117-138.
35. Perry S.R. Judicial Obligation, Precedent and the Common Law // Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 7, No. 2 (Summer, 1987), pp. 215-257.
36. Plucknett T.F.T. The Relations between Roman Law and English Common Law down to the Sixteenth Century: A General Survey // The University of Toronto Law Journal, Vol. 3, No. 1 (1939), pp. 24-50.
37. Pollock F. Expansion of the Common Law. III. The Sword of Justice // Columbia Law Review, Vol. 4, No. 2 (Feb., 1904), pp. 96-115.
38. Pollock F. The Expansion of the Common Law. I. The Foundations of Justice // Columbia Law Review, Vol. 3, No. 8 (Dec., 1903), pp. 505-525.
39. Pollock F. The Expansion of the Common Law. II. The Scales of Justice // Columbia Law Review, Vol. 4, No. 1 (Jan., 1904), pp. 12-32.
40. Pollock F. The Expansion of the Common Law. IV. The Law of Reason // Columbia Law Review, Vol. 4, No. 3 (Mar., 1904), pp. 171-194.
41. Pollock F. The Genius of the Common Law. I. Our Lady and Her Knights // Columbia Law Review, Vol. 12, No. 3 (Mar., 1912), pp. 189-198.
42. Pollock F. The Genius of the Common Law. II. The Giants and the Gods // Columbia Law Review, Vol. 12, No. 4 (Apr., 1912), pp. 291-300.
43. Pollock F. The Genius of the Common Law. III. Surrebutter Castle // Columbia Law Review, Vol. 12, No. 5 (May, 1912), pp. 387-394.
44. Pollock F. The Genius of the Common Law. IV. Enemies in the Gate // Columbia Law Review, Vol. 12, No. 6 (Jun., 1912), pp. 481-495.
45. Pollock F. The Genius of the Common Law. V. Rescue and Ransom // Columbia Law Review, Vol. 12, No. 7 (Nov., 1912), pp. 577-588.
46. Pollock F. The Genius of the Common Law. VI. Alliance and Conquest // Columbia Law Review, Vol. 12, No. 8 (Dec., 1912), pp. 659-672.
47. Pollock F. The Genius of the Common Law. VII. Perils of the Market-Place // Columbia Law Review, Vol. 13, No. 1 (Jan., 1913), pp. 1-12.
48. Pollock F. The Genius of the Common Law. VIII. The Perpetual Quest // Columbia Law Review, Vol. 13, No. 2 (Feb., 1913), pp. 93-103.
49. Pope H. The English Common Law in the United States // Harvard Law Review, Vol. 24, No. 1 (Nov., 1910), pp. 6-30.
50. Riddell W.R. Common Law and Common Sense // The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 27, No. 8 (Jun., 1918), pp. 993-1007.
51. Rubin P.H. Why Is the Common Law Efficient? // The Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1 (Jan., 1977), pp. 51-63.
52. Sarfatti M. Roman Law and Common Law: Forerunners of a General Unification of Law // The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 3, No. 1 (Jan., 1954), pp. 102- 115.
53. Schechter F.I. Popular Law and Common Law in Medieval England // Columbia Law Review, Vol. 28, No. 3 (Mar., 1928), pp. 269-299.
54. Simmons J.F. The Territorial Expansion of the Common Law Ideal // Michigan Law Review, Vol. 4, No. 1 (Nov., 1905), pp. 1-18.
55. Simon J. The Common Law // The Virginia Law Register, New Series, Vol. 7, No. 10 (Feb., 1922), pp. 721-725.
56. Stone H.F. The Common Law in the United States // Harvard Law Review, Vol. 50, No. 1 (Nov., 1936), pp. 4-26.
57. Terrebonne R.P. A Strictly Evolutionary Model of Common Law // The Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2 (Jun., 1981), pp. 397-407.
58. Thayer E.R. Judicial Legislation: Its Legitimate Function in the Development of the Common Law // Harvard Law Review, Vol. 5, No. 4 (Nov. 15, 1891), pp. 172-201.
59. The Adoption of the Common Law // Columbia Law Review, Vol. 16, No. 6 (Jun., 1916), pp. 499-502.
60. The Adoption of the Principles of Equity Jurisprudence into the Administration of Our Common Law. Second Article // The American Law Register (1852-1891), Vol. 8, No. 11 (Sep., 1860), pp. 641-654.
61. The Adoption of the Principles of Equity Jurisprudence into the Administration of the Common Law. First Article // The American Law Register (1852-1891), Vol. 8, No. 9 (Jul., 1860), pp. 513-525.
62. The Inefficient Common Law // The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 92, No. 5 (Apr., 1983), pp. 862-887.
63. The Roman and the Common Law // Harvard Law Review, Vol. 9, No. 6 (Jan. 25, 1896), p. 422.
64. The Theory of a "Federal Common Law" // Harvard Law Review, Vol. 18, No. 2 (Dec., 1904), pp. 134-135.
65. The Unwisdom of the Common Law // Harvard Law Review, Vol. 10, No. 1 (Apr. 25, 1896), p. 53.
66. Touster S. Holmes: The Years of "The Common Law" // Columbia Law Review, Vol. 64, No. 2 (Feb., 1964), pp. 230-247.
67. W. E. C. The Adoption of the Principles of Equity Jurisprudence into the Administration of Our Common Law. Third and Concluding Article // The American Law Register (1852-1891), Vol. 8, No. 12 (Oct., 1860), pp. 705-716.
68. Whitman D.G. Evolution of the Common Law and the Emergence of Compromise // The Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 29, No. 2 (Jun., 2000), pp. 753-781.
69. Ziskind M.A. John Selden: Criticism and Affirmation of the Common Law Tradition // The American Journal of Legal History, Vol. 19, No. 1 (Jan., 1975), pp. 22-39.

CIVIL AND COMMON LAW: COMPARISON

1. Amos M.S. The Common Law and the Civil Law in the British Commonwealth of Nations // Harvard Law Review, Vol. 50, No. 8 (Jun., 1937), pp. 1249-1274.
2. Auld F.C. The Common Lawyer and the Civil Law // The University of Toronto Law Journal, Vol. 2, No. 1 (1937), pp. 119-122.
3. Chesterman M. Contempt: In the Common Law, but Not the Civil Law // The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 46, No. 3 (Jul., 1997), pp. 521- 560.
4. Cohn E.J. The Board of Review. A Novel Chapter in the Relations between Common Law and Civil Law // The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 4, No. 4 (Oct., 1955), pp. 492- 507.
5. Cooper T.M. The Common and the Civil Law. A Scot's View // Harvard Law Review, Vol. 63, No. 3 (Jan., 1950), pp. 468-475.
6. Dainow J. The Civil Law and the Common Law: Some Points of Comparison // The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 15, No. 3 (1966 - 1967), pp. 419-435.
7. Frank J. Civil Law Influences on the Common Law. Some Reflections on "Comparative" and "Contrastive" Law // University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 104, No. 7 (May, 1956), pp. 887-926.
8. Hamilton P.J. The Civil Law and the Common Law // Harvard Law Review, Vol. 36, No. 2 (Dec., 1922), pp. 180-192.
9. Hoeflich M.H. John Austin and Joseph Story: Two Nineteenth Century Perspectives on the Utility of the Civil Law for the Common Lawyer // The American Journal of Legal History, Vol. 29, No. 1 (Jan., 1985), pp. 36-77.
10. Lee R.W. The Civil Law and the Common Law: A World Survey // Michigan Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 2 (Dec., 1915), pp. 89-101.
11. Mezey S.G. Civil Law and Common Law Traditions: Judicial Review and Legislative Supremacy in West Germany and Canada // The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 3 (Jul., 1983), pp. 689- 707.
12. Seipp D.J. The Reception of Canon Law and Civil Law in the Common Law Courts before 1600 // Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 13, No. 3 (Autumn, 1993), pp. 388-420.
13. Subrin S.N. How Equity Conquered Common Law: The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in Historical Perspective // University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 135, No. 4 (Apr., 1987), pp. 909-1002.
14. The Legitimacy of Civil Law Reasoning in the Common Law: Justice Harlan's Contribution // The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 82, No. 2 (Dec., 1972), pp. 258-285.
15. Washburn E. The Relation of the Civil to the Common Law // The American Law Register (1852-1891), Vol. 21, No. 11, New Series Volume 12 (Nov., 1873), pp. 673-681.
16. Yntema H.E. Equity in the Civil Law and the Common Law // The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 15, No. 1/2 (1966 - 1967), pp. 60-86.

Подробности

14.09.10

Просмотров: 2974